Hamish & Milo Programme boosts confidence, wellbeing and engagement – and reduces exclusions in primary schools
New research by the University of Bath shows that a targeted social-emotional curriculum
helped children ‘find their voice’ – improving wellbeing and behaviour while reducing exclusions.
This two-year study of the Hamish & Milo Programme reveals compelling evidence that focused support can transform pupil outcomes in the post-pandemic era.
About the research study
Children’s social and emotional needs have risen dramatically in recent years, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Many schools report increasing numbers of pupils struggling with anxiety, low resilience, and challenging behaviours. The most current research, conducted in 2023, shows a significant increase with one in five children and young people now described as having a probable mental health disorder¹ and suspensions and permanent exclusions increasing significantly. Suspensions increased for primary-aged children by 27% last year and permanent exclusions increased for primary pupils by 58%.²
In response, Hamish & Milo – an organisation dedicated to improving children’s mental health and wellbeing – developed a targeted emotions curriculum for social-emotional learning and SEMH intervention delivered through structured small-group sessions. The programme aims to help children feel happier, heard, and connected by building their social and emotional competencies and become more self-confident, resilient and less anxious, with improved self-regulation and readiness to engage in learning and fulfil their potential with evidence-based resources and activities. To understand the impact of this approach, the University of Bath’s Department of Psychology collaborated with Hamish & Milo to rigorously evaluate the programme’s effectiveness in real school settings.
Study design
Researchers conducted a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study over two academic years. Around 90 primary schools across England implemented the Hamish & Milo Programme with selected pupils needing extra support with SEMHD. 1,600+ primary aged children participated, including many with special educational needs or facing adversity, and were compared on key outcomes before and after the intervention.
Schools uploaded data to a digital platform tracking each child’s progress through standardised assessments. These measures included the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – a widely used emotional and behavioural screening tool – as well as child self-report ‘Child’s Voice’ questionnaires and teacher-observed ‘Child Wellbeing Profiles’ tailored to the programme.
In addition, researchers gathered qualitative feedback via staff questionnaires and interviews (with headteachers, SENCOs, ELSA support staff, etc.) to capture experiences and perceptions in depth. This combination of quantitative and qualitative data provides a robust picture of the programme’s impact.
This multi-dimensional approach allowed the research team to understand not just whether the programme worked – but how and for whom it had the greatest impact.


Results and outcomes
Why these findings matter for schools
This study provides strong evidence that a structured social-emotional programme can make a meaningful difference in primary schools and improve pupil outcomes. In a time when schools are grappling with a rise in emotional and behavioural needs, the Hamish & Milo project offers a promising solution backed by data. The key ‘so what’ for school decision-makers is that investing in pupils’ social and emotional development pays off; children not only feel happier and more supported, but they also engage more in learning and require fewer disciplinary interventions. Reducing exclusions and behaviour incidents means more time in class and learning and a safer, more positive environment for everyone.
For headteachers and pastoral leaders, the report’s findings reinforce the value of allocating time and resources to SEL initiatives and SEMH interventions. Even with tight budgets and curriculum pressures, targeted programmes like Hamish & Milo show that we can address the multifaceted root causes of SEMHD if we focus on the needs behind the behaviour, rather than the behaviour itself.

Staff involved in the project noted that having a ready-to-run, evidence-based framework was crucial – it filled a gap where previously support might have only been available for individual cases. With this programme, schools could proactively support groups of children, using a consistent structure and language that the whole school could embrace. The result was a more inclusive school culture where children feel safe to express themselves and build trust with adults.
In summary, the University of Bath’s project shows that the Hamish & Milo Programme is an effective, research-backed approach to improving children’s emotional wellbeing, behaviour, and engagement at school. The combination of hard data and testimony delivers a clear message; when schools prioritise social-emotional learning, children thrive – personally, socially, and academically that can lead to better long-term outcomes.
This evidence can inform policy and practice, giving school leaders confidence that dedicating effort to SEL and SEMH support is not just compassionate, but also leads to measurable improvements in outcomes that matter, from happiness in the playground to attention in lessons and reduced exclusions.